Chemistry has always moved forward on the back of fresh discoveries and relentless trial-and-error. The path to Sodium 35-Bis (B-Hydroxy Ethoxy Carbonyl) Benzene Sulfonate dissolved in ethylene glycol traces back to collective efforts of synthetic chemists in the late 20th century. Back then, developers looked for advanced surfactant agents that could stand up to both industrial use and laboratory scrutiny. Over the decades, the search for niche sulfonate compounds, driven mainly by textile and detergent industries, led researchers to combine aromatic sulfonates with various glycol derivatives. Eventually, the specific combination with ethylene glycol showed not only improved solubility but also enough versatility to be tested across a wide range of chemical processes. Researchers often recall those years as frenetic but fruitful, as pharmaceutical and materials science sectors jumped on board to find ways this molecule could add value.
This chemical solution walks the line between specialty surfactant and high-performance process aid. The compound, best described as a sodium salt featuring a benzene sulfonate backbone, borrows the hydrophilicity from ethylene glycol, anchored by its dual (B-hydroxy ethoxy carbonyl) side chains. Its molecular architecture results in reliable solubility in both water and certain organic media. Through my own experience in pilot plant trials, I’ve seen this substance make a noticeable difference in dispersing hydrophobic substances—an ability that saves both time and raw material. Market references often cluster around its uses in advanced detergents, emulsion polymerization and even as a stabilizer in pigment and dye prep, a tangibly important benefit for everyday manufacturing. Labeling typically stresses the glycol component, as it signals improved compatibility for certain temperature-sensitive formulations.
Sodium 35-Bis (B-Hydroxy Ethoxy Carbonyl) Benzene Sulfonate has a crystalline powder form when isolated, but in a glycol solution, it pours as a clear to faintly opalescent liquid. Its melting point trends above 200°C in pure form; solubility in water and polar solvents surpasses many structurally similar compounds, thanks to the glycol ether linkage. The sulfonate group draws in cations, allowing for fast ion exchange, a blessing in high-throughput production lines. Chemical stability holds up at moderate acid or base conditions, rarely dropping any functional capacity save for extremes on the pH spectrum. My time in formulation showed how it resists thermal degradation—handy for multi-step syntheses and those sticky cleanup scenarios that haunt lab techs. The solution’s specific gravity hovers near 1.15 at room temperature, a trait welcomed by engineers tuning flow properties in batch reactors.
Suppliers typically standardize their ethylene glycol solutions at concentrations between 20% and 50%. Labels show detailed compositional data: sodium content, glycol content, sulfonate purity, residual moisture and recommended storage conditions—cool, dark and tightly sealed. Shelf-life extends easily to 24 months if kept at stable humidity. From firsthand experience, companies that publish transparent batch QC results demonstrate clear trustworthiness, a principle outlined in every quality assurance guide I’ve ever read. Useful labeling also lists reactivity profiles with common alkalis and oxidizers, something too few chemical products underline, despite real-world impact on plant safety and cleanroom operations.
Production starts with an aromatic substitution: benzene rings receive their sulfonate decoration under pressure, catalyzed by fuming sulfuric acid. After strict monitoring, the intermediate is washed, neutralized and funneled through carbonylation using glycol ethers, often with zinc or tin catalysts at moderate heat. Specialized reactors handle the two-stage alkoxylation, giving rise to the dual (B-hydroxy ethoxy carbonyl) groups. Engineers add sodium hydroxide to convert the acid intermediate into its sodium salt, before filtering and stabilizing the finished solution in ethylene glycol. Quality depends on close control of each stage. Any shortcut leads to incomplete reactions, murky product and unpredictable results, a risk far too familiar in some cut-corner manufacturing sites. Having watched plant operators sweat through each step, I can attest to the discipline required for every batch.
This molecule reacts mainly through its sulfonate moiety and glycol-based ends. Strong acids or oxidants can hit the ethoxy carbonyl linkage, sometimes cleaving ether bonds if left unchecked. More practically, chemists modify the sulfonate for custom surfactants by swapping sodium for other alkali or alkaline earth metals, tweaking the ionic size and charge for fit in specialty materials. Attempting to derivatize the aromatic ring opens the door to tailored UV absorbers, though yields rarely match what textbooks claim. Personal attempts at grafting polyethylene oxide chains revealed stubborn bottlenecks—mainly poor phase transfer—yet small tweaks, like adding phase transfer catalysts, move these projects forward.
Trade and technical circles reference many names, from the dry, clunky “Sodium 35-Bis(beta-hydroxyethoxycarbonyl)benzenesulfonate” to abbreviated catalog entries. Some vendors brand it under system names linked to detergent lines, especially in Asia-Pacific, while niche materials outfits use short-codes blending “SBEBS” with the suffixes for solvent types. Informal lab work often sticks with “glycolated sodium benzene sulfonate” to distinguish it from similar but non-glycolated analogues. The diversity in nomenclature reflects different markets and regulatory histories, leading to some confusion for those jumping between suppliers or submitting regulatory paperwork. Vigilant cross-checking is not optional.
Safe handling demands gloves, face shields and proper ventilation—eye and skin irritation strikes fast upon exposure, a lesson one learns after a slip-up or two. Material safety data sheets recommend winching up the first aid response in cases of ingestion, especially since glycolic solvents can react with body chemistry unpredictably. Storage tanks must resist corrosion and avoid direct sunlight to sidestep peroxide formation, a hazard raised in safety briefings more than once. Disposal stays tightly regulated: wastewater regulations ban high-concentration releases, obliging producers to run solution through activated carbon or advanced oxidation systems. Routine monitoring of plant vapor and spill response cut down on workplace incidents. Rather than shortcuts, training and upgraded PPE keep operators out of urgent care—a lesson chemical workers pass on with due seriousness.
This chemical finds a place in detergent synthesis, textile finishing, emulsion polymerization, pigment dispersion, and in select cases, as an antistatic agent or lubricant component. I’ve tested performance in pigment dispersion systems, where it helps wetting and suspension, preventing costly settling that plagues both small and industrial-scale paint jobs. In advanced textiles, its inclusion boosted dye uptake efficiency, a change that translated into significant water and dye savings. Electronics manufacturers examine its anti-static properties, drawn by the molecular stability under repetitive charge-discharge cycles. Its precise function always depends on local context—a formulation tweak here or a process change there—yet the overriding factor is always its surface activity and compatibility with mixed blends.
Scientists push boundaries by exploring new modifications and advanced application methods. Recent studies dig into the interplay between the benzene ring and alternative glycol ethers, some shifting toward greener bio-derived variants. Research tries to minimize environmental release by developing more biodegradable analogues. I remember a collaboration testing how small molecular changes could influence dispersion and biodegradability—results showed trade-offs between efficiency and breakdown speed. Labs use advanced chromatography and mass spectrometry, mapping degradation pathways and testing for persistence in aquatic systems. R&D isn’t limited to the lab; field trials with partner industries give feedback that directly shapes second-generation variants.
Animal studies rack up data on acute and chronic effects. Short-term exposure tests on rodents typically target oral and dermal toxicity; results suggest manageable risk in controlled use but raise caution over prolonged or repeated exposure. Ethylene glycol itself is a known risk for kidney and central nervous system stress at high doses, so solution concentrations and inhalation safeguards stay in place. Long-term studies look for environmental impacts—soil and aquatic toxicity in particular. Laboratory data drive policy on maximum workplace concentrations, spill response protocols and permitted discharge levels. Regulatory agencies in Europe and North America take a conservative approach to new approvals, often requiring more paperwork and longer observation windows before use in sensitive sectors like food-contact materials.
Innovation often springs from necessity. As regulatory frameworks tighten around persistent chemicals, future versions of this sulfonate will look to pack the same wetting and dispersing punch while breaking down faster in natural environments. Researchers lean hard on computational chemistry to model greener substitutes, test alternative reaction paths and explore bio-based glycols. Industrial partners want low-toxicity solutions able to clear more hurdles in eco-certification. As industries invest in circular processes, recovery and recycling of specialty chemicals like these will draw more interest, both for cost savings and for regulatory compliance. Sustainable chemistry holds the promise of cleaner, cheaper, more widely accepted solutions, provided it meets the high bar of performance current applications enjoy. Experience shows that those willing to experiment, document robustly and share data between suppliers, regulators, and users will shape the next chapter of surfactant chemistry.
Most folks glance at a chemical name like Sodium 35-Bis (B-Hydroxy Ethoxy Carbonyl) Benzene Sulfonate Of Ethylene Glycol Solution and wonder if it’s just another mouthful from a laboratory. In fact, this compound anchors itself in the story of how industrial and household detergents work today. Growing up on well water gave me an early crash course in hard water stains, spots on dishes, and soapy films in old tubs. It still surprises me how much engineering goes into making basic cleaning feel seamless.
This solution acts as a surfactant, breaking up stubborn grease, grime, and particulate stuck to fabric, dishes, or machine parts. If laundry detergents or industrial cleaners left residues behind, customers would notice hard water deposits and dingy finishes pretty quickly. Chemists blend molecules like this one for their persistent charge—attaching firmly to dirt on one end and pulling it away with water on the other. Many people never realize that getting their whites whiter takes both clever marketing and a potent mix of engineered molecules working overtime, often cutting through oily or mineral build-up in environments as different as home bathrooms and remote mining gear.
Dealing with oily residues in a busy restaurant or clearing industrial boilers highlights one truth: not every soap is built to tackle every mess. Sodium 35-Bis (B-Hydroxy Ethoxy Carbonyl) Benzene Sulfonate Of Ethylene Glycol Solution shines in applications where both oil and mineral fouling overlap. Common detergents sometimes collapse in high-calcium water. In contrast, chemicals like this punch through hard water interference, targeting complex deposits and breaking bonds that resist standard cleaners.
Industry insiders keep turning to these sulfonates for another reason—environmental demands are tightening. Regulators push back on phosphorus releases and harsh additives that don’t break down. This specific class of surfactant offers a safer profile; it goes easier on aquatic systems after household or industrial discharge. Experience running a small family cafe taught me real-world cleaning isn’t just about sparkle—it’s about protecting pipes, meeting health codes, and not catching flak for water safety violations. Relying on contemporary surfactants lowers both maintenance costs and compliance headaches.
Of course there’s no such thing as a free lunch, even in formulation chemistry. Chemicals this powerful have to win support from both environmentalists and engineers. Spillages or sloppy handling in manufacturing can create localized pollution. To guard against environmental harm, tighter protocols around storage, use, and disposal matter. Investing in better closed-loop systems in larger laundries, for instance, reduces both chemical loss and groundwater risk.
On the user end, educating staff on proper dosing changes everything. Too much product means higher costs and extra residues, feeding straight into clogged pipes or wastewater fines. Regular training in handling and dilution rates saves cash and trouble in the long run. Full transparency on ingredient sourcing reassures customers who care about what ends up in rivers and streams.
Better scientific research continues to improve these surfactants every year. Labs develop new versions that biodegrade even faster, hitting grease and minerals without lingering downstream. Policy, science, and small business habits all connect behind the scenes any time a restaurant opens for breakfast or a new uniform rolls out of a laundry press.
Questions about product safety never go away. Plenty of manufacturers trust their suppliers, trusting that a product labeled for “industrial applications” will keep workers and equipment out of trouble. From years spent working with teams on factory floors, misplaced trust often leads to near-misses. Product safety claims can’t be taken at face value. You need to dig deeper and see what’s behind the label.
Every product used in a factory or processing environment should come with test data. I’ve seen companies get burned by skipping this step and believing sales pitches. Third-party safety testing always brings a peace of mind you just don’t get from a glossy brochure. Certificates for things like ISO 9001, REACH, or local regulatory compliance point to a solid safety approach. Anything that lacks testing documentation should raise a red flag. Access to material safety data sheets (MSDS) gives you answers about chemical composition and possible hazards. Toxicity, reactivity, and flammability get spelled out. If suppliers can’t provide official documentation, you can’t be sure of what’s entering your workplace.
It’s easy to overlook the practical impact: A “safe” product that actually puts workers or machinery at risk will cost more in the long run. Respiratory problems, skin irritation, or unexpected breakdowns force costly downtime and medical bills. Workers who handle a new material, coating, or solvent count on real protection, not vague reassurances.
I’ve known line supervisors forced to scramble when a new adhesive turned out to need extra ventilation and gloves. Nobody can afford to guess. By checking the occupational exposure limits—the numbers set by agencies like OSHA—teams know what kind of controls or personal protective equipment (PPE) need to be in place from day one. Good suppliers talk openly about possible risks from dust, fumes, or contact.
Some products interact badly with certain metals or plastics. Over time, this eats into the reliability of systems and can wreck expensive gear. Compatibility tables from the manufacturer help avoid surprise failures, but it takes more than glancing at a chart. Maintenance crews who spot corrosion or gumming up early make a difference, but they only get that chance if management checks compatibility before introducing something new.
Trust in a product grows when risk assessments happen at the start. People on the ground should walk through the basic questions: Are there spill or leak risks? Could vapors build up? Will this interact with coolant lines or other chemicals already in use? Every workplace brings its own quirks. No amount of laboratory data replaces a hands-on review.
Getting employees involved in safety checks builds a stronger safety culture. Tool-box talks and real-life walkthroughs often reveal issues that documentation misses.
Companies following the best safety practices never treat product safety as a one-time box to check. Regular reviews, honest supplier conversations, and a willingness to share safety information keep surprises out of the picture. Seeking out third-party certifications and maintaining clear communication channels mean teams stay ahead of hazards. In the end, insisting on transparency provides better outcomes for workers, equipment, and the company’s reputation.
A lot of people underestimate how quickly a chemical solution can go bad, turn dangerous, or lose its punch without proper handling. I’ve learned the hard way: keeping chemicals in the wrong spot led to ruined projects and wasted money. Improper storage can spark fires, poison the air, or lead to quality failures nobody saw coming. The Environmental Protection Agency and OSHA both agree: most accidents could have been avoided with basic preparation.
The solution might not demand a special fridge or expensive shelters, but stable temperature makes all the difference. Keep it in a cool, dry spot out of sunlight. I’ve watched heat slowly break down solutions until they stopped working. Sunlight can split molecules apart or reduce shelf life, especially with sensitive mixtures. It’s tempting to tuck bottles on a window shelf for convenience, but a shaded, ventilated cabinet away from outside walls keeps things safe.
It’s not just about how you store; the container matters too. Never use food jars or old soda bottles. Chemicals leach into soft plastics, react with metal lids, or look like something safe. Labels make everything easier—include the contents, date received, and lot number. That habit saved me multiple headaches during surprise inspections and inventory checks. If somebody in your house confuses your solution for vinegar, you’ll wish you’d labeled it.
Store acids on lower shelves; keep bases far from anything acidic or reactive. Even trace residues from a spill can cause a dangerous mess. In the lab, I always kept everything in separate trays. A neighbor once kept bleach near ammonia cleaners—bad idea. They almost passed out from the chemical fumes after a spill. Settlement trays, plastic bins, and even basic drip mats prevent hazards. Don’t trust your memory about what’s safe next to what—check a compatibility chart and follow it to the letter.
Lock up anything hazardous, especially if children or pets roam the space. It’s easy to think “nobody goes in there,” right until something goes missing. Store keys somewhere inconvenient for kids but accessible enough for regular checks. Wear gloves that match the hazard level. For strong acids or solvents, go for nitrile or neoprene. Eye protection cuts the risk of splashes dramatically; I once splashed a dilute solution and avoided disaster since I wore basic goggles. Don’t forget the eyewash station or at least a clean water source nearby.
Set a calendar reminder to check storage twice a year—look for leaks, expired solutions, or damaged labels. Old containers can swell, rupture, or crust over. I’ve found forgotten formulas hiding in the back, posing a surprise risk. Better to catch that before it catches you. If the solution is beyond its expiration date, contact hazardous waste disposal for pickup. Never pour chemicals down the drain unless it’s specifically allowed by local guidelines. Even “safe” chemicals can wreak havoc in pipes or water systems.
Mistakes and best practices get passed on by word of mouth. Connect with local safety trainers or online groups. Someone else’s accident or tip might save your day. Look up the SDS sheet every time—some chemicals appreciate unique storage requirements or have limits on the time they’ll remain stable, especially if it’s not your everyday stock solution.
Taking care of solutions is less about fancy equipment and more about daily habits and clear thinking. These practical steps protect health, property, and peace of mind.
Product safety gets a lot of attention for good reason. Everyday items on store shelves—cleaners, cosmetics, even snacks—carry more than the convenience we expect. They can also pose real risks if not handled or stored properly. My own kitchen shelf tells the story. From laundry pods to oven spray, every label sends a message: don’t ignore the warnings.
Bleach works wonders on stains, but those fumes turn dangerous if they mingle with ammonia. That chemical reaction releases a gas once used as a weapon. I knew a neighbor who mixed cleaning agents and ended up with a terrible cough and dizzy spell—luckily, she called for help in time. Reports show thousands of accidental poisonings from similar mistakes happen each year, according to CDC data. Storing cleaners out of children's reach and reading directions before each use can cut the risk dramatically.
Batteries in toys and remotes look harmless, but a child who swallows one may need surgery in a matter of hours. The American Academy of Pediatrics says button batteries send more than 2,500 kids to the ER annually in the US. Child-resistant packaging protects against this, but the real power lies in checking toys often and teaching kids to never put them in their mouths.
Food is another area where hazards hide in plain sight. A bag of nuts missing an “allergen” warning puts someone with a nut allergy in real danger. Just one overlooked ingredient can send a person into anaphylactic shock, and EpiPens aren’t always nearby when disaster strikes. Manufacturers face tighter regulations every year, yet mistakes slip through. Anybody with severe allergies should stick to trusted brands, check ingredient lists twice, and contact companies if something seems unclear.
Hot foods left out for too long become breeding grounds for bacteria. Salmonella and E. coli aren’t rare. They often appear in news reports after a recall. Following the instructions on packaging really matters—refrigerate leftovers, heat meats to the proper temperature, and skip food that smells odd.
Shiny electronics come packed with their own set of risks. Phone chargers heat up and can start fires if ignored under piles of clothes. My phone once shut down after I used a cheap replacement charger that nearly melted. Investing in branded cables and unplugging devices before bed avoids this headache. Consumer safety groups like UL test chargers for a reason—skipping certified accessories can cost more than the few bucks saved.
Talking about lithium-ion batteries, headlines regularly feature hoverboards or e-bikes bursting into flames due to poor design or misuse. Placing these items on fire-resistant surfaces and never leaving them charging unattended goes a long way. The National Fire Protection Association shares stories of entire homes lost to battery fires.
A few habits make a big difference: Read safety warnings, store products securely, and keep emergency numbers accessible. Companies bear responsibility, but informed consumers prevent most accidents before they happen. Sometimes peace of mind starts with just flipping over a box and skimming the label.
Sodium 35-Bis (B-Hydroxy Ethoxy Carbonyl) Benzene Sulfonate Of Ethylene Glycol Solution sounds intimidating on a chemical label. The day I first dealt with this in an actual lab, safety goggles fogged and MSDS sheet in hand, nobody offered a simple answer for how to get rid of it safely. Despite the confusion, safe disposal is not a guessing game. Mistakes with chemicals like these end up causing real problems—corroded waste pipes, small-scale pollution, and potential health scares for waste facility workers.
I learned early on that sending anything down the drain isn't worth the gamble, especially with glycol-based solutions mixed with aromatic sulfonates. These compounds don’t just break down in the soil or water. If they hit municipal wastewater, the breakdown products travel far—affecting aquatic life and slipping back into drinking water. That’s not just a lab problem, but something everyone in the community stands to face over time. Plenty of municipalities have busted labs and businesses for dumping “gray area” chemicals, leading to fines and more paperwork than anyone enjoys.
Whenever anyone in a workgroup asked me how to get rid of substances like these, I always pointed them toward hazardous waste collection. Facilities set up for this kind of chemical work exist for a reason. They don’t just take barrels and keep them out of sight—they break them down or incinerate them with systems meant to neutralize active chemicals, control air emissions, and ensure nothing builds up downstream. In my experience, local environmental health departments or safety officers provide straight answers—usually a form, some labeling, and instructions for storage until pickup. I’ve found they’re more interested in helping out at the start than chasing mistakes later.
Anyone dealing with leftover chemical solution should use containers that won’t break down or interact with the contents. Polyethylene jugs with tight-fitting lids work well for this particular solution. Sticking on a clear and honest label is more than just following the rules—mislabeling leads to dangerous mix-ups. Keeping the chemical in a cool, secure cabinet, away from acids and common cleaning agents, reduces risk until waste management teams take over. If you’re unsure, ask—the worst mistake is assuming it’s “probably” safe to mix with something else.
If you come across this solution in a home setting (not common, but it happens with old inherited garages or DIY hobby kits), don’t toss it in the trash or dilute it in the sink. Contact local household hazardous waste events or call the municipal environmental office. I once helped a neighbor with leftover chemicals from an old hobby—the city’s hazardous waste day made it simple. No drama, no cost, and the peace of mind that somebody with a hazmat suit and proper tools did the job right.
Any chemical, especially complex synthetic solutions, comes with a footprint. Handling waste with care prevents harm far beyond the lab or workspace. Facilities, scientists, hobbyists—everyone involved needs patience, a little humility to ask for help, and a steady respect for their neighbors downstream. I’ve always found that getting it right is easier and safer than cleaning up after a mistake.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | sodium 2,5-bis(2-hydroxyethoxycarbonyl)benzenesulfonate |
| Other names |
Sodium salt of bis-(2-hydroxyethoxycarbonyl)benzene sulfonic acid in ethylene glycol EGBS Na salt EGBS-Na solution Sodium 1,3-benzenedisulfonate, bis(2-hydroxyethoxycarbonyl) derivative, ethylene glycol solution |
| Pronunciation | /ˈsəʊdiəm ˈθɜːti faɪv bɪs ˌbiː haɪˈdrɒksi ɪˈθɒksi kɑːˈbɒnɪl ˈbɛnziːn sʌlˈfəneɪt əv ˈɛθɪliːn ˈɡlaɪkɒl səˈluːʃən/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 56641-58-0 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3084661 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:78329 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL2103837 |
| ChemSpider | 52123683 |
| DrugBank | DB15916 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03-2119945940-55-0000 |
| EC Number | 93951-93-2 |
| Gmelin Reference | 1671908 |
| KEGG | C16612 |
| MeSH | Carboxylic Acids, Sodium Compounds, Ethylene Glycols, Sulfonic Acids, Hydroxy Acids |
| PubChem CID | 16211046 |
| RTECS number | NJ6975000 |
| UNII | S00Q539G8A |
| UN number | UN3082 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID9011301 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C17H21NaO9S |
| Molar mass | 580.58 g/mol |
| Appearance | Light yellow transparent liquid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.27 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | -2.13 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 7.8 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 6.8 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | `-41.2×10⁻⁶ cm³/mol` |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.486 |
| Viscosity | 80-200 CPS |
| Dipole moment | 3.87 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 100.5 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | A06AD15 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | I’m sorry, but I do not have access to the specific main hazards information for "Sodium 35-Bis (B-Hydroxy Ethoxy Carbonyl)Benzene Sulfonate Of Ethylene Glycol Solution." For accurate hazard details, please consult the product’s Safety Data Sheet (SDS). |
| GHS labelling | GHS05, GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS05,GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | Hazard statements: H315, H319, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | Precautionary Statements: P264, P280, P305+P351+P338, P337+P313, P501 |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-1-0 |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat): >5000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (oral, rat): >2000 mg/kg |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 25 mg/m³ |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Benzene sulfonic acid Sodium p-toluenesulfonate Ethylene glycol Bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate Sodium sulfate |
