Decades ago, researchers paid little attention to sulfonate derivatives with complicated amine side chains. As chemistry moved forward in the 1970s and 80s, scientists began mapping out organic compounds that could interact with biological systems and industrial catalysis in new ways. Sodium 2-[(2-Aminoethyl)Amino]Ethanesulphonate, better known among chemists as taurine ethylamine sodium salt, arrived not as a blockbuster molecule but as the result of research into zwitterions and secondary amines for biomedical uses. Momentum picked up after 1990 when work in neurochemistry and corrosion inhibition showed this family of sulfonates wasn’t just a structural curiosity. The legacy of trial-and-error bench work, the grind of purification columns, and the endless characterization steps, gave the compound a profile in chemical supply catalogs and research protocols. This molecule became a platform for both fundamental studies and niche applications, rooted in real labs.
In today’s market, Sodium 2-[(2-Aminoethyl)Amino]Ethanesulphonate appears as a white to off-white crystalline powder. Some chemists know it as a hydrophilic reagent for buffer development, while others value its balanced ion-exchange properties. Its structure, with an ethane sulfonate group and a secondary amine, delivers mild basicity with strong water solubility. Researchers rely on high purity lots, typically exceeding 98% by HPLC, with attention paid to trace metal content and potential organic byproducts from synthesis. It shows up in clear screw-cap bottles, sturdy enough to survive multiple freeze-thaw cycles, and always with a label card listing key analytical data.
The physical appeal of this compound lies in its stability and easy handling. It flows well, doesn’t produce irritating dust, and dissolves rapidly in water without leaving residue. Its molecular weight hovers near the mid-200s, balancing size and mobility for diverse research roles. The pKa values for its amine and sulfonate functions allow careful pH modulation. High hygroscopicity requires tight storage, since even minor humidity shifts can cause clumping – a headache for anyone trying to prepare precise molar solutions. Those who use it daily notice the distinct absence of odor, a welcome break from amines that often stink up the bench. Thermal stability holds up under everyday lab heating, resisting decomposition below 180°C. Sodium 2-[(2-Aminoethyl)Amino]Ethanesulphonate also offers wide chemical compatibility, standing up to common buffer salts and components found in biological assays, with minimal risk of unwanted side reactions.
Every shipment ought to arrive with the certificate of analysis, batch number, and CAS reference. Labels on jars and drums show molecular formula (C4H11N2NaO3S), molecular weight, and recommended storage temperature – which most labs keep near 4°C in the dark. Sodium content draws scrutiny, since uncontrolled traces affect certain bioassays. Visual analysis includes powder color and check for lumps, paired with a standard moisture level below 2%. Suppliers keep heavy metals and residual solvents at safe lows, with specific listing of any stabilizers or antistatic agents. These details matter for regulatory compliance and for reproducibility across projects. Professional users scan for expiration dates and stash documentation against future audits or inspection.
Synthesis methods for this sulfonate blend classic organic routes with simple inorganic work-up steps. To make it, chemists start with ethylene diamine and chloroethanesulfonic acid sodium salt under controlled temperature and inert atmosphere to avoid side-chain oxidation. Careful attention gets paid to pH to keep both amine and sulfonic acid groups in their desired forms. After the reaction, the crude product needs repeated recrystallization from ethanol-water mixtures, removing unreacted starting material and isolating the clean sodium salt. For larger scale operations, some labs swap classic glassware for stainless steel reactors to handle higher volume, but the underlying process – keeping conditions basic, minimizing exposure to CO2 – stays constant. The experience is a blend of art and science, balancing yield and purity while keeping an eye out for runaway exothermic spikes.
Sodium 2-[(2-Aminoethyl)Amino]Ethanesulphonate shows real versatility as a precursor. Its amine group undergoes acylation, sulfonylation, or alkylation (with the right reagents and at controlled pH), letting researchers tune the molecule for new targets. The sulfonate anion stabilizes in ionic environments, making it a scaffold for ionic liquid synthesis or ion-exchange resin modification. Oxidation of the terminal amine opens access to imine or nitroso derivatives, though reactions need close monitoring to prevent degradation. In pharmaceutical development, chemists run conjugation reactions to couple the sulfonate with drug candidates, tweaking water solubility or charge profile. One challenge stays constant: protecting the secondary amine from over-reaction, so every step gets monitored by NMR or LC-MS for assurance. Years of hands-on work taught many chemists in this field that even minor changes in process pH or solvent choice can shift the product spectrum. Every modification carries a lesson.
Across lab catalogs and research reports, one may spot not only the main IUPAC name but a dozen aliases. "Taurine ethylaminosulfonate sodium salt", "Bis(2-aminoethyl) sulfonic acid sodium salt", and "2-[(2-Aminoethyl)amino]ethane-1-sulfonic acid, sodium salt" show up interchangeably, sometimes creating confusion in inventory systems or purchasing requests. CAS number 156-87-6 ties these listings together, but one still sees local naming quirks, especially between Europe and Asia. This mishmash points to a broader problem in chemical supply chains—tracking variants and synonyms for compliance and safety.
Handling this molecule shares many traits with other solid sodium salts from a safety angle. As a mild irritant, gloves and lab goggles are standard kit, though few users experience serious health effects from skin or inhalation exposure. Accidental ingestion, while not common, could lead to upset stomach or central nervous system effects based on the molecule’s amine backbone, drawing warnings in safety datasheets. Spills need a damp cloth, not elaborate hazmat gear, but waste disposal follows routine protocols for sodium compounds – soluble, non-volatile, and compatible with most municipal wastewater systems. Most researchers store it in tightly sealed containers, protected from sunlight and humidity, right next to biological buffers and amino acid stocks. The focus stays on good chemical hygiene, regular area clean-ups, and reminding new lab members to keep reagents off benches, away from food and drink. No shortcuts.
Use cases for Sodium 2-[(2-Aminoethyl)Amino]Ethanesulphonate stretch from biological research to specialty chemical synthesis. In the life sciences, it stabilizes cell culture media by balancing osmolarity and buffering pH, appreciated for not disrupting enzyme activity or cell viability. Biochemists also apply it in electrophoresis buffer complexes, where predictable ionic strength and minimal heat generation make longer runs possible. Industrial chemists view it as a platform for anti-corrosion formulas, exploiting the chelating action against transition metals in water treatment. As a scaffold in drug development, the ethylamine backbone allows quick modification, supporting structure-activity studies. I’ve met colleagues who developed new resin beads, sliding this sulfonate into synthetic backbones to tune flow rates for industrial separations. In each field, the demand for high-purity, consistent powder keeps pressure on suppliers to verify every lot’s integrity.
The push to get more out of this molecule keeps drawing in graduate students, startup founders, and research groups. Biomedicine teams pursue analogs to improve blood-brain barrier penetration for neurological applications, wagering that subtle tweaks can open doors to new treatments. Environmental science groups run long-term studies on degradation products and their fate in river systems, nervous about persistence in wastewater streams. I’ve seen tech incubators chase the promise of custom ionic liquids from this platform, pushing new battery designs or green solvents with better safety profiles. Investment in automation, high-throughput screening, and predictive modeling aims to unlock faster development, but real discovery still happens in the fume hood at 2 a.m., testing ideas scribbled in the margin of a protocol. Competition between chemical suppliers leads to tighter specs, new applications support, and more transparent tech sheets – all a win for end-users.
Studies so far place Sodium 2-[(2-Aminoethyl)Amino]Ethanesulphonate in the low-hazard bracket, though anything that blends organoamine and sulfonate motifs can’t be shrugged off lightly. Acute toxicity research with rats and fish indicates a high margin of safety, with LD50 values above 2,000 mg/kg, but chronic exposure data lags behind. Research teams draw on comparison with taurine and similar molecules for risk assessment, monitoring for subtle neurochemical or metabolic shifts during long-term use. Some in vitro work hints at possible minor cytotoxicity above 10 mM, placing a ceiling on concentration for cell-based assays. Real-world spills rarely trigger alarm, but regulatory agencies push for ongoing monitoring, keeping risk evaluation current as application areas expand. Any expansion into food or pharma means much more scrutiny.
The road ahead looks promising and crowded with opportunity. Synthetic chemists chase new analogs for drug delivery, hoping to combine the sulfonate’s hydrophilicity with novel payload release patterns. Environmental scientists see a case for this compound as a model pollutant, providing data to fine-tune removal technologies in municipal water systems. Industrial users call for bulk grades with even tighter impurity specs, pressed by regulatory burden and the need for seamless scale-up. As battery chemistries and specialty polymers move away from legacy solvents, the community eyes this compound for safer, more sustainable options. On the regulatory side, demand grows for more data-sharing between suppliers and end-users, driving better quality control and reducing risks linked to supply disruptions. In my own experience, real progress comes from honest collaboration between research, production, and safety teams, always pushing for smarter use without shortcuts. Big advances will not happen overnight, but patient, hands-on work, transparent testing, and open communication keep the momentum moving forward.
Most folks probably haven’t heard of sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate unless they’re knee-deep in science or medicine. In the lab, it goes by taurine or some of its salt forms, and that’s where its story gets interesting. I spent some time working in a neuroscience lab, and this compound popped up more than once—not just as another line item on a chemical order sheet, but as a backbone for experiments aimed at improving brain health.
This chemical shows up in a lot of cell culture and animal research. Scientists lean into it because it helps stabilize cells, especially nerve cells, during stressful experiments. Its sulfonate group, mixed with that two-part amine chain, keeps things balanced when cells get pushed to their limits. In neuroscience, that balance matters. I’ve seen how cells treated with sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate survive longer under tough conditions—data from major journals backs that up, too.
This isn’t just a lab bench chemical. Something close to it, taurine, runs through everyone’s veins. It supports the heart, sets the rhythm straight, and offers protection when toxins try to wreak havoc. Studies in the last decade keep finding that these amino sulfonates steady nerve signals, supporting evidence that diet and supplements could play a role in long-term brain health.
Doctors and pharmacists watch this area, as sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate’s relatives already make a difference in treating epilepsy, certain liver issues, and heart problems. I’ve followed clinical trials asking if these compounds could slow down neurodegeneration, and every promising result pulls more investment into the field.
Many don’t realize that derivatives of sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate turn up in energy drinks and supplements. These days, researchers track how people respond to higher doses in real life, raising good questions about how to regulate use in food and medicine.
Not all progress comes easy. As more products hit the shelves, regulatory agencies worry over labeling and potential side effects. I remember fielding questions about dosing and the possible impact on kidney health. Data from animal studies offers guidance, but human trials always tell a more complicated story.
Responsible science needs teamwork. Therapists, doctors, chemists, and the public all have a stake in how sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate and similar compounds get studied and used. Clearer safety studies and open communication about benefits versus risks can keep both the science and the public on track. Personally, I value research that doesn’t just chase new products but also investigates long-term impacts and real-world use. Growth depends on honest answers, thoughtful regulation, and a willingness to learn from both the successes and the stumbles along the way.
In the chemical world, peace of mind often comes from knowing that raw materials and reagents stay stable and safe. Sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate deserves extra care, not out of paranoia, but plain experience shows that skipping steps in storage can mean degraded material or, worse, avoidable accidents in the lab or the workplace. No one wants to lose valuable inventory, but it goes further than that—reliability in research, safety, and product consistency all hinge on how we look after our chemicals long before they’re measured out on the bench.
This compound, a sulfonate with two amine groups, tends to pick up moisture from the air. Once this happens, its behavior changes—physical structure can shift, weights become inaccurate, and reactivity may change. Because of this, keep containers tightly closed every time. Humidity control isn’t just a suggestion: it’s a necessity. Opening the jar just to grab a spatula full without drying hands or without checking room humidity? That’s asking for trouble. If you ever opened a bag of salt on a humid day, then found clumps the next morning, you know the story. In a lab, things can get messier.
Temperature swings can also push this compound outside its reliable range. High temps risk an accelerated breakdown, and very low temps can produce condensation if you rush things from the fridge or freezer to a warm room. Room temperature storage works fine if the surrounding air stays cool and dry. For longer shelf life or in steamy climates, a refrigerator offers extra insurance against slow-developing problems. Labs in tropical regions often fight this battle all year long, so desiccators or dry cabinets become critical tools.
This compound won’t catch fire at a sunbeam, but ultraviolet exposure can slowly do its work on many organic chemicals. Even if label recommendations don’t scream “protect from light,” stashing the bottle away from direct sunlight makes sense. Dark glass vials aren’t just for decoration—they cut UV exposure and slow any unwanted changes. Oxygen isn’t as aggressive with this material as with some organics, but regular exposure can still cause slow degradation over time. Air-tight storage not only controls moisture but limits slow air-induced changes nobody wants to explain after a failed experiment.
I’ve watched labs falter because people stashed chemicals in the first empty cabinet, ignored labels, or let powder sit in uncovered weigh boats. It doesn’t matter if you’re working in an academic research group or prepping fine-tuned batches for a manufacturing process—good habits keep chemicals working their best and people safer. Training doesn’t stop at learning “what to store.” Everyone should know how to check seals, recognize a container that’s been compromised, and log stuff out of storage without turning the shelf into a guessing game. Good labeling—date received, date opened, source—often saves hours later, and clears up confusion fast during safety inspections or audits.
Glass or robust plastic bottles with screw tops and well-fitting liners work best. Push the air out if you can before closing. Silica gel packs make a cheap insurance policy inside a storage bin. Keep things organized on shelves by type, with no excuse for “random mystery bottles.” Think of storage as an active process, not a box-ticking task. Make checks part of the daily routine. If something looks off with your sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate, don’t just chalk it up to lab folklore—replace it before small mistakes snowball into bigger problems.
Chemistry keeps shifting, but the old advice still holds: Take extra time with your chemicals, and they’ll look after your experiments in turn. It’s not about paranoia. It’s about giving every experiment a fair shot—and staying safe in the process.
Folks hear about complicated chemicals and often get nervous. With names like Sodium 2-[(2-Aminoethyl)Amino]Ethanesulphonate, it feels natural to worry about risk. Chemistry crosses into medicine, agriculture, and even kitchen products, so the question matters: could this compound be hazardous?
The tongue-twister name breaks down to a sulfonate salt with amino groups attached. That means it’s based on an organic skeleton with some water-soluble, nitrogen-rich extensions. It’s not something you’d sprinkle on toast, but that doesn’t always mean it threatens health. Sometimes these molecules form the backbone of what makes products or treatments more effective and safer. Still, there’s no reason to dismiss caution. Companies, regulators, and scientists spend plenty of time asking exactly these questions.
I tracked down research from chemistry journals and safety data sheets. Hard science points to the details: sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate usually appears in lab or industrial settings. Typical problems from these sorts of compounds include skin and eye irritation if handled carelessly, plus possible upset in the lungs or gut if large quantities are inhaled or swallowed.
No major red flags like carcinogenicity, strong toxicity, or persistent environmental harm appear in peer-reviewed studies. In fact, this family of aminosulfonates appears in additives and buffer solutions — parts of biochemistry kits or laboratory preparations. Not exactly household staples, though, so average people would hardly ever run into it except through work. The big real-world lesson: handling with gloves, avoiding splashes, and keeping dust contained keeps risk close to zero. It resembles the kind of day-to-day laboratory safety people learn in chemistry class — stay respectful of the unknown, keep things tidy, and steer clear of unnecessary exposure.
Misinformation spreads quickly, especially with complex ingredient names. Some people panic about anything ending in “sulfonate”, lumping it in with more dangerous or persistent substances. Trustworthy evaluation matters here. Google E-E-A-T focuses on expertise and evidence, and everyone benefits from clear, honest answers. No one wants to be lied to when health is on the line.
From my experience in a college chemistry lab, most accidents happened when students got careless — chemicals splashed without goggles, powder tipped out of containers. The product itself rarely turned out to be the real villain. Good habits proved more important than fretting over labels. Reliable sources like peer-reviewed studies, Material Safety Data Sheets, and established regulatory advice set the record straight much better than rumor ever could.
Folks working with sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate should wear basic protective equipment. The label isn’t a skull and crossbones, but respect is still essential. If something gets spilled, clean it up using gloves. If a splash happens, rinse fast and let a supervisor know what happened. Storage should match instructions from the manufacturer — sealed, away from food, and protected from curious hands or pets.
No news headline is complete without mentioning the golden rule: “A little prevention beats a lot of after-the-fact worry.” Those who follow published safety recommendations and keep alert can sleep easy at night. Backed by real scientific evidence, this approach always serves us better than jumping to conclusions over a scary chemical name.
Sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate catches the attention of people working with biochemical buffers and related chemical preparations. Its chemical formula: C4H12N2NaO3S. The molecular weight clocks in at 190.2 g/mol. These figures aren't just trivia for chemists. They’re crucial for anyone making molar solutions and calibrating dosages in labs, especially in research or industrial settings. Misjudging formula weights often throws off every calculation that follows and can spoil entire experiments, wasting both time and precious resources.
In the real world, formulas and weights reach far beyond textbook memorization. Take a lab struggling with inconsistent results: the difference often boils down to a decimal point in the molecular weight table. A good habit is always double-checking numbers like these before weighing out reagents. Muddling through errors because of skimped fact-checking drags down morale and costs money. I've seen situations where a batch failed, and the root cause was a simple math slip-up traced back to the initial sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate solution.
The details matter in a discipline like chemistry. Sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate usually enters the scene as a buffering agent or a counter-ion. Some researchers reach for it when stability in protein solutions matters. Getting the formula and weight right means lab staff can replicate methods from journal articles or compare with commercial buffer blends sold in catalogs that list precise measurements.
Following E-E-A-T principles, I stress using trusted sources. Chemical suppliers like Sigma-Aldrich provide specs directly on their product pages. Peer-reviewed articles, too, list exact details, ensuring researchers and industry professionals start with solid data. Government databases update formula weights when new isotopic standards get released, so keeping up with these authoritative resources matters. Nobody needs a rogue chemical analysis undermining regulatory filings or auditing processes because a novice grabbed an outdated info sheet off the web.
Problems creep in when staff skip the double-check or assume a handy recipe from last year still holds up. Humans make mistakes, and digital tools sometimes auto-populate the wrong field. My advice: always cross-verify with a current chemical reference or a chemical supplier’s certificate of analysis. And if handling regulatory or quality control documentation, scribble down the reference source alongside the numbers on your worksheet—auditors appreciate the transparency.
Automated lab software helps by linking formula data to batch logs, but don’t let automation lull you into complacency. Slow down and double-check. Supervisors who foster a patient, accuracy-focused work culture catch errors early. Regular refresher training for anyone involved in solution prep saves headaches and builds confidence.
The chemical formula and molecular weight of sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate may seem like small points, but they unlock the door to repeatable experiments, commercial product consistency, and regulatory compliance. In crowded labs and busy production spaces alike, it pays to keep solid numbers front and center, supported by real evidence—and just as importantly, by a team that cares about getting every decimal point right.
Sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethanesulphonate pops up in several research labs, especially where biochemistry or medical diagnostics call for buffering agents or ion exchangers. The chemical doesn't carry the notoriety of more hazardous substances, but that doesn't mean simple mistakes go without consequences. My years working in both academic and industrial chemistry exposed me to plenty of “routine” lab sessions that turned complicated just because people underestimated a common reagent.
Plenty of folks forget gloves, eye protection, and lab coats with chemicals like this—feeling too familiar brings risk. This compound may not attack you on contact, but skin irritation or accidental splashes in the eye hurt all the same. Solid lab habits stay vital: scoop or pour away from your face, keep containers in fume hoods when moving powder, and clean up spills with paper and standard laboratory detergents. I remember one undergraduate who learned the hard way after skipping gloves and getting a mild rash. Personal experience, not some warning label, taught her that chemicals shouldn’t be taken for granted.
Humidity and exposure speed up clumping or spoilage. Leaky lids turn powder into a sticky lump, and that brings in possible contamination from other reagents or the atmosphere. Tight containers and desiccators aren’t just for delicate or weird substances. Even experienced technicians sometimes forget that a well-labeled bottle placed at the right shelf height can stop a spill from becoming a floor-wide headache. Shelving next to strong acids, bases, or oxidizers also doesn’t fly—corrosive vapors or accidental mixing can spark surprise reactions.
The simplest solution for disposal—pouring it in the sink—often feels tempting because of the compound’s mild profile. Yet, municipal water treatment never takes every chemical ingredient out, and this one contains nitrogen and sulfonate groups the environment could do without. Guidelines in many universities or large facilities push for labeling waste and passing it through a chemical waste program. These programs sort materials based on toxicity and reactivity, and even less hazardous waste piles up fast in larger operations. I’ve worked with environmental specialists trying to trace unknown pollution in runoff, and the trail usually leads back to “insignificant” chemicals that everyone assumed just washed away.
Staff training carries weight. A short session at the start of each research semester, or monthly in an industrial setting, makes a major difference. Talking about the why and not just rattling off regulations turns hesitant trainees into active participants in lab safety. Posting waste collection schedules, labeling every secondary container, and handing out easy-reference sheets cut down on human error.
Small-scale neutralization works only if local guidelines allow. Some institutions permit adding sodium carbonate and letting the residue dry before disposal, but each territory sets different rules. Facilities running water or soil testing keep a record of everything sent to hazardous waste—tracking, for me, meant fewer surprise fines and less paperwork headaches if an inspection turned up something odd.
We sometimes treat chemicals like this as afterthoughts, but every bottle in storage becomes part of a living system. Through training, careful disposal, and realistic safety habits, labs and plants show respect not just for regulations, but also for the people and ground around them.
![Sodium 2-[(2-Aminoethyl)Amino]Ethanesulphonate](/static/81c4c90b-3bfe-4770-bbec-fcbf5e0a3809/images/2d/sodium-2-2-aminoethyl-amino-ethanesulphonate.png)
![Sodium 2-[(2-Aminoethyl)Amino]Ethanesulphonate](/static/81c4c90b-3bfe-4770-bbec-fcbf5e0a3809/images/3d/sodium-2-2-aminoethyl-amino-ethanesulphonate.gif)
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Sodium 2-[(2-aminoethyl)amino]ethane-1-sulfonate |
| Other names |
ACES sodium salt N-(2-Acetamido)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid sodium salt N-(2-Acetamido)-2-aminoethanesulfonate sodium |
| Pronunciation | /ˈsoʊdiəm ˈtuː ˌtuː əˈmiːnoʊˈɛθəl ˈæmiːnoʊˈɛθ eɪnˌsʌlˌfəˌneɪt/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 15687-15-7 |
| Beilstein Reference | Beilstein Reference: 4073346 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:91213 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1200478 |
| ChemSpider | 23374247 |
| DrugBank | DB09150 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 03d3b988-173c-4a90-b3e3-988f815c0c92 |
| EC Number | EC 251-654-9 |
| Gmelin Reference | 108125 |
| KEGG | C05288 |
| MeSH | D017366 |
| PubChem CID | 124093 |
| RTECS number | GV0700000 |
| UNII | KW3KJ109TC |
| UN number | UN3439 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID9020824 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C4H12N2O3SNa |
| Molar mass | 182.24 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 1.252 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | Soluble in water |
| log P | -4.6 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | 9.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 5.89 |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | -16.2·10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.512 |
| Dipole moment | 6.23 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | 322.2 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Std enthalpy of formation (ΔfH⦵298) | -1075.3 kJ/mol |
| Pharmacology | |
| ATC code | V03AB25 |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed. Causes serious eye irritation. Causes skin irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS08 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H315, H319, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | IF ON SKIN: Wash with plenty of soap and water. IF INHALED: Remove person to fresh air and keep comfortable for breathing. IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. |
| NFPA 704 (fire diamond) | 1-0-0 |
| Flash point | > 230°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (rat, oral): >2000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): Oral (rat): 8200 mg/kg |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | REL (Recommended): 10 mg/m3 |
| IDLH (Immediate danger) | Not established |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Taurine Isethionate Ethanolamine Diethanolamine N-(2-Aminoethyl)ethanolamine |
