Learning how scientists discovered, refined, and then harnessed the blend of compounds like L-valine, ethanesulphonic acid, octadecan-1-ol, docosan-1-ol, and eicosan-1-ol offers a glimpse into the step-by-step nature of progress in chemistry. Each ingredient took a unique road. L-valine, known since the early 20th century, drew attention as folks saw its value for muscle recovery and metabolism. Ethanesulphonic acid entered the toolkit because of its role in catalysis and as a sulfonating agent. The long-chain fatty alcohols, octadecan-1-ol, docosan-1-ol, and eicosan-1-ol grew popular in the second half of the twentieth century, mainly for their performance as emollients, lubricants, and surfactants—and that happened as new extraction and purification technologies spread from labs to factories. Over time, blending these elements in precise ratios opened up new uses, not just straight, but together, where applications seemed more than the sum of the parts. Looking at the journey, the push to maximize resource extraction and product utility led industry and academia to pool knowledge, build patents, and publish data, letting formulations based on this specific reaction mass become more reliable and more broadly available than ever.
Start with the backbone: L-valine is an essential amino acid, vital for protein biosynthesis in every living thing. In contrast, ethanesulphonic acid works as a strong organic acid and a solid catalyst in certain organic transformations, especially where water is unavoidable. The fatty alcohols—octadecan-1-ol (stearyl alcohol), docosan-1-ol (behenyl alcohol), and eicosan-1-ol (arachidyl alcohol)—have straight hydrocarbon chains of differing, easily recognized lengths. These compounds join together, thanks to either keen chemical compatibility or reliable solubility in industrial solutions, giving finished materials properties prized in cosmetics, lubricants, coatings, and the pharmaceutical sector. It’s the mix of these fatty alcohols with an amino acid and a sulfonic acid that enables design of tailored phase behavior, selective solubilization, and even new opportunities for controlled release or targeted surface modification, all of which underscore the product’s importance. Ask a process engineer or a formulator, and many have worked with at least one of these molecules—often relying on proprietary reaction masses to solve a headache that a single molecule alone never could.
L-valine shows up as a white, crystalline solid, stable and innocuous under typical storage but readily soluble in water thanks to its charged carboxyl and amino groups. Ethanesulphonic acid, a colorless to yellow liquid, brings a sharp, pKa value that’s hard to miss, and its miscibility with water makes it an efficient catalyst, not prone to easy decomposition. Octadecan-1-ol, docosan-1-ol, and eicosan-1-ol, all pasty solids or waxes in daily room conditions, show near-zero solubility in water but good solubility in alcohols and ethers. The physical interplay between water-soluble and lipid-soluble components in one reaction mass leads to interesting dispersibility, potential for controlled emulsification, and enhanced delivery of active ingredients. In the lab, you’ll spot technologists blending these compounds with precise heating and agitation to create a stable, homogenous, milky-white mixture with smooth flow for predictable processing and application.
Practical use depends on detailed labeling: concentration of each individual component (for instance, 20% L-valine, 10% ethanesulphonic acid, with the remaining made up of defined ratios of the three fatty alcohols), batch numbers, manufacturing date, purity (always above 98% for medical-pharmaceutical grades), melting point, water content by Karl Fischer titration, and color by standard Gardner or Hazen scales. Suppliers often present Certificates of Analysis to back up claims and meet international guidelines like REACH or FDA cGMP, so end users—whether R&D scientists or plant operators—can quickly determine chemical identity and suitability for their unique application. Labels sometimes warn about skin or eye irritation from ethanesulphonic acid, and storage recommendations steer you toward cool, dry, well-ventilated stock rooms.
Industrial synthesis marries lab-time patience with production urgency. L-valine is usually fermented from plant starch or sugars using engineered bacterial strains, purified by crystallization and rotary vacuum evaporation. Ethanesulphonic acid is manufactured through sulfonation of ethane with oleum or through direct reaction of sulfur trioxide with ethanol. The fatty alcohols come primarily from catalytic hydrogenation of natural vegetable waxes, such as palm, rapeseed, or whale oil in legacy operations—though now palm-free fats are growing in popularity, linked to sustainability certifications. Mixing these compounds relies on controlled heating and high-shear mixing to dissolve ethanesulphonic acid into L-valine saturated aqueous solution, with the fatty alcohol blend suspended or partially emulsified, sometimes with a surfactant, to achieve a uniform distribution. For GMP or high-purity requirements, sterile filtration and nitrogen blanketing stand as best practices. Production cycles usually build in environmental monitoring, tracking not just yield but by-product evolution, with routine testing for off-spec odors, color drift, and chemical purity.
These ingredients react together mainly through acid-base interactions and the ability of ethanesulphonic acid to promote esterification or sulfonation under controlled pH and heat. L-valine’s amino group can interact with fatty alcohols to create novel amide or ester derivatives when pushed to high temperatures in the presence of drying agents. Chemical modifications often target the tuning of solubility, shelf-life, or application-specific properties such as improving the water resistance of emulsions or increasing the lubricity of ointments. In many collaboration labs, scientists extend these processes to add antioxidant side-chains or convert components into ether derivatives for more demanding temperature stability or vapor pressure characteristics. At the heart, modification strategies put a premium on mild conditions to protect L-valine’s chiral integrity—enantiopurity cracks fast under harsh acid or heat, so reactions stay monitored with chiral HPLC.
Anyone searching safety databases or product catalogs finds a jungle of synonyms. L-Valine may also be listed as Val, 2-Amino-3-methylbutanoic acid, or (S)-Valine. Ethanesulphonic acid comes up as esylic acid or ethanesulfonic acid. The fatty alcohols respond to names like stearyl alcohol (octadecanol), behenyl alcohol (docosan-1-ol), and arachidyl alcohol (eicosan-1-ol), as well as their confusing INCI codes—right at home in the cosmetics and pharma-understanding crowd. As a reaction mass, commercial products sometimes take on blend-oriented brand names or are referenced as proprietary surfactant complexes or pharmaceutical matrix excipients, depending on the industry. Decoding these variations brings up plenty of headaches for buyers and regulators making sure labels match Safety Data Sheets, and the move towards full substance and blend transparency keeps picking up speed—especially across the EU, Japan, and APAC regulatory circles.
Every production shift and lab experiment drills down on safety checks. Ethanesulphonic acid stands out for its irritant nature, able to eat through gloves or cause burns unprotected. Solid fatty alcohols appear benign but their dusts can pose respiratory risks when handled in bulk. L-Valine poses a low hazard profile, but as a powdered amino acid, inhalation or long-term exposure can surprise with allergic responses. Rigorous wearing of gloves, lab coats, splash goggles, and use of explosion-proof mixers reduces risk. Safety Data Sheet review, air monitoring, and spill response protocols form policy. Training never feels optional; even long-timers can learn something new—recalls of mismeasured acid causing runaway exotherms prove the point. Waste management stresses collection of contaminated rinse water, acid neutralization, and packing residues for licensed disposal or solvent reclamation, following national and international environment codes. In regulated pharmaceutical systems, every change in sourcing or formulation mandates a full review under ISO 9001 or ICH Q7, and routine audits keep everyone sharp.
The reach of this multi-component blend spreads wide. Pharmaceutical companies use it for making controlled-release drug delivery matrices, emulsifiers, and excipient platforms for peptide or protein stabilization. Cosmetics industries create creamy lotions and stable emulsions using the fatty alcohol mix. Lubricants and coatings optimally balance hardness, spread, and volatility using such combinations to achieve low-temperature lubrication in sensitive machinery or water-resistant barriers on electronics. Food science sometimes leans on the high purity grades for protein fortification or texturizing agents that carry little flavor while improving mouthfeel. In the biotech edge, L-valine-rich blends have shown promise for cell culture media enhancement when fatty alcohols serve as membrane integrity stabilizers. In my own professional circle, plenty of food and pharmaceutical scientists credit breakthroughs to hopping between applications and repurposing blends that don’t seem to fit until someone tests an “impossible” combination and hits a winner.
Research teams across universities and the R&D wings of multinational companies continue chasing new possibilities. Whether it’s tweaking the molar ratio of L-valine to fatty alcohols, adjusting hydration level, or finding the optimal temperature window to preserve reactivity while avoiding side-reactions, experimentation drives progress. A lot of current work centers on improving biocompatibility, reducing allergenicity, or speeding up the dissolution profile for medical applications. Analytical technology, from HPLC-MS to thermal gravimetric analysis, gives teams clearer insight into what shifts during storage and real-world application. Patents pop up regularly as particular blends show improvements in drug solubility, delayed-release coatings, or topical absorption. The research crowd has taken up green chemistry, optimizing synthesis routes for lower solvent use, minimizing reaction temperature, and recovering waste heat, not only to cut production costs but also to earn points for sustainability goals demanded by global clients.
The components in this combo demand scrutiny, especially as public and regulatory attention around chemical mixture safety grows. L-valine, a dietary amino acid, shows a reassuring safety record in acute and chronic studies, only raising a flag in rare metabolic disorder cases. Ethanesulphonic acid, on the other hand, does trigger skin irritation at moderate concentrations and comes under fire for aquatic life toxicity at high discharge levels, making closed-loop water and effluent control a smart investment. The fatty alcohols’ safety profiles, documented since the 1970s, support their use in topical and oral products; though, in rare settings, hypersensitivity and mucosal irritation crop up. Animal studies and in vitro tests haven’t shown significant mutagenic or carcinogenic effects for the mixture at practical exposure levels. Regulatory panels still insist on comprehensive toxicological dossiers that don’t just add up the parts, but test the mixture itself to catch unexpected synergies. Getting this science right steers clear of scares, supports honest marketing, and frames open dialogue with customers and the public.
Prospects for this chemical blend look far from static. A push toward cleaner, bio-based sourcing of fatty alcohols and fermentation of L-valine points to lower-carbon and pesticide-free credentials. Advances in encapsulation, nanotechnology, and targeted delivery keep driving demand for stable, customizable reaction masses in pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, and specialty coatings. Digital manufacturing—using inline sensors to manage real-time composition and adjust on the fly—now lets operators catch drift before batches go off spec, boosting quality and cutting waste. Growing pressure from environmental and health authorities, especially around micro-contaminants and lifecycle impacts, nudges developers to run better life-cycle analysis, invest in end-of-life biodegradability, or chase closed-loop recycling for process waters. Over time, those shifts promise to make these age-old compounds new again, giving labs, workshops, and manufacturers a toolkit with real leverage for the next round of innovation.
When most people glance at a chemical combination like L-Valine paired with ethanesulphonic acid and fatty alcohols such as octadecan-1-ol, docosan-1-ol, and eicosan-1-ol, it’s easy to tune out. The label sounds strictly academic, yet these compounds shape industries and daily lives in subtle ways. Having years of hands-on time in both biotech research and product development, I’ve seen the journey from raw chemicals to real-world results. Think amino acids, surfactants, emulsifiers, and formulations that quietly hold consumer products together.
L-Valine isn’t only for sports supplements. This essential amino acid, when reacted, helps improve solubility and bioavailability of vital ingredients, especially in pharma and nutrition. Once combined in a “reaction mass” with ethanesulphonic acid, it gets another level of stability. This pairing assists with making certain medicines more effective, improving absorption and stability in tablets and liquid formulas. Science backs this up—studies on amino acid and sulfonic acid reactions hint at breakthroughs in active pharmaceutical ingredient design, cutting down on lost potency and unpredictable shelf lives.
Octadecan-1-ol, docosan-1-ol, and eicosan-1-ol belong to the family of fatty alcohols. People familiar with cosmetics or health products might recognize the texture or sensory properties these bring. In reaction mass compositions, these alcohols boost emulsification and prolong product shelf life. They keep active ingredients evenly distributed, preventing separation and spoilage. For example, in creams or ointments used for wound care or skin hydration, this chemical combo delivers a texture that feels comfortable, spreads evenly, and allows for controlled release of the main active ingredients. Without them, the results feel greasy, clumpy, or short-lived.
Many personal care brands now look for alternatives to petroleum-based stabilizers. Long-chain fatty alcohols from plant sources and safer reaction partners such as L-valine and ethanesulphonic acid offer a dependable option. They allow companies to meet consumer demand for cleaner ingredients without loss of performance. I’ve watched as product lines switched from synthetic surfactants to these reaction masses and cut down customer complaints about sensitivity or unwanted residues. Research shows these combinations degrade more readily in the environment than older emollients and surfactants.
Medicines, especially those difficult to absorb, depend on how their compounds interact with each other. This reaction mass doesn’t just stabilize active ingredients. It fine-tunes how quickly and efficiently a medicine reaches bloodstream or tissues. I’ve visited small pharma labs using this approach, achieving higher patient compliance and fewer side effects. Evidence from regulatory submissions confirms gains in clinical performance with this type of reaction mass.
There’s always room to improve. Manufacturers sometimes struggle with batch-to-batch consistency and sourcing pure, sustainable starting materials. Creating improved monitoring—like using real-time analytics on production lines—helps keep quality up and costs under control. Partnerships between ingredient suppliers and brands can keep the supply chain transparent, while investing in green chemistry ensures the path remains clean for both people and planet. From direct application in pharmaceuticals to behind-the-scenes work in daily-care products, this reaction mass quietly pushes industry forward with smarter, science-driven choices.
Every day, new blends and reaction masses shape the world of cosmetics and medicine. There’s always a push for something that works better, feels smoother, or looks more appealing. But each new ingredient triggers a big question: Is it truly safe?
The process of ensuring an ingredient’s safety can’t take shortcuts. In my own work with regulatory teams and product developers, I’ve noticed how assumptions about “industry standards” can lead to trouble. Years ago, a blend that seemed harmless left dozens of people in hot water because companies leaned on incomplete testing. That situation pressed a clear point into the industry: every reaction mass has its own risks, and it’s not enough to say, “It’s just chemicals mixed together.”
Europe, the United States, and Japan all hold strong opinions about new ingredients. The EU’s REACH regulation and the US FDA push hard for data about genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, and how these substances travel inside our bodies. If a reaction mass hasn’t passed through this maze of studies, regulators tend to block it. I’ve read reports where one missing animal study delayed a launch for years. Of course, those delays keep people from facing unexpected rashes or worse side effects.
The most trusted evidence comes from independent labs and published clinical trials. Trust isn’t built from marketing brochures or generic test certificates. In practice, top companies invest in real-life repeat insult patch tests for anything applied to skin and preclinical studies for anything swallowed. The work is slow and expensive—yet a single case of systemic toxicity costs much more, in both dollars and public trust.
Shoppers rely on brands to do their homework, but problems still happen. Take it from someone who once had a close family friend react badly to an “all natural” face cream. If an ingredient pops up on an INCI list or shows up in drug information, dig into whether it’s backed by more than just a clever name. Certifications from groups like the European Medicines Agency or the US Pharmacopeia matter. Looking for Allergan, Ecocert, or EWG scores helps spot the difference between a truly vetted ingredient and something that slipped through a regulatory loophole.
A safer future for personal care and medicine depends on field-tested, transparent research. Data sharing across borders makes it harder for dangerous reaction masses to end up in your home. I have worked side-by-side with chemists who always publish their negative findings, even when it hurts profits. That approach saves lives.
Some of the most powerful solutions come from traceability: full records showing where every gram originated and how it was handled. Manufacturers who open their books don’t just comply—they show pride in their results. By asking hard questions about every new reaction mass and refusing to brush off side effects, the industry can offer true peace of mind. Safe ingredients aren’t a given; they’re earned, through vigilance at every step.
Questions about safety pop up for good reason. Consumers put a lot of trust in companies, often without really knowing what goes into a product. A family might pick up a cleaner, a shampoo, or even a food preservative from the local store and assume it’s harmless. But history keeps reminding us not to take things at face value—sometimes a product later reveals risks hidden behind a shiny label.
Reading the back of a product shed light on what actually goes inside. Too many products use unfamiliar names for chemicals, which doesn’t help anyone make a clear decision. For example, preservatives like parabens gained popularity thanks to their ability to prevent mold. The truth came out only after years of use—scientific studies found that some parabens can mimic estrogen and connect with hormone disruption. The FDA has looked into it, but uncertainty still hangs in the air.
Strong fragrances offer another lesson. Companies use a mix of chemicals called phthalates to make scents last longer. Overuse links back to respiratory issues and even some hormone disruption. The American Academy of Pediatrics flagged this years ago. The issue isn’t just about one ingredient—it’s about the unpredictable effects of mixing several chemicals in daily life.
Open ingredient lists give people the power to make smarter choices. If a company skips full disclosure or hides behind vague terms like “fragrance,” it shuts down meaningful conversation about risk. I remember my own family switching laundry detergents—my mother started getting skin rashes, only to find out that certain products did not list all fragrance chemicals. Once we found a brand with nothing to hide, those rashes disappeared.
Rules from agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency or FDA aim to keep harmful chemicals away from shelves. Yet those agencies also rely heavily on studies paid for by manufacturers, and laws sometimes let companies skip tests for older or “grandfathered” chemicals. Look at talcum powder for instance—after decades of widespread use, asbestos contamination in some talc products led to lawsuits and recalls. People need better systems in place, with strong, independent testing before a product reaches the store.
Long ingredient names shouldn’t scare us off, but they do call for a closer look. Start with reading labels and learning which terms connect to real risk. Third-party agencies, like the Environmental Working Group, help break down ingredient lists for everyday people. Parents, gardeners, and pet owners can look up chemicals themselves instead of taking labels as gospel.
Companies that want loyal customers should invest in robust safety testing and go above and beyond basic legal requirements. Brands that brag about being “natural” or “eco-friendly” still owe their buyers clear evidence. A product with a clean safety sheet earns more trust than a brand built on vague marketing.
If we keep raising questions, searching for facts, and asking for transparent research, product safety becomes less about luck and more about learning. That’s a win for everyone who cares about what goes into their homes—and their bodies.
Anyone who has handled chemicals understands how a simple mistake during storage can spell big trouble. Ask any laboratory technician or seasoned plant manager. One miscalculation in where or how a reaction mass stays can turn from a harmless oversight into a serious incident overnight.
There’s no single recipe for every reaction mass, but some ground rules crop up again and again. Temperature swings threaten more than just stability. In my early days running quality control, we had a blend that looked stable at room temperature but started shifting if left near a window for a week. The batch became unpredictable, and some batches were lost to decomposition. Sunlight and heat act like amplifiers. They speed up unwanted side reactions and turn manageable chemicals into hazardous waste. Keeps things under 25°C unless the manufacturer spells it out otherwise. Better to invest in temperature monitoring than mop up after a spill that could have been avoided.
Sealed containers probably spring to mind first, but humidity slips through unnoticed. I’ve watched buckets of what should have been dry powder turn clumpy after just a weekend in a damp room. Hydroscopic substances pull water right from the air, setting off complications that no one needs. Dedicated low-humidity storage spaces—desiccators, dry cabinets, or at least a climate-controlled store—cut down that risk drastically. Moisture creates not just a mess but sometimes dangerous reactions, depending on the chemistry involved. Don’t trust a flimsy lid against real dampness; double containment can mean the difference between a routine shift and hazardous waste headaches.
Some batches let off fumes even while sitting idle. I learned the hard way in a small facility, discovering late at night that a reaction mixture stored in a closed cabinet nearly set off the fire alarm. Proper ventilation whisks away flammable or noxious vapors before they concentrate. A dedicated store with forced air exchange keeps both staff and product safer in the long run, especially if the material releases acidic or toxic emissions. Good ventilation design protects health, the environment, and the investment represented by every drum and flask.
Anyone working around reaction mixtures should know the nature of the beast. Without clear labeling, all the best procedures fall apart. Make sure every container spells out what’s inside, potential risks, and required storage conditions—water sensitivity, flammability, temperature, and ventilation needs. Training isn’t just a sign-in sheet. Teach staff to recognize signs of trouble, such as swelling containers, off odors, or changes in color.
Following globally recognized guidance pays off. Documents like the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) and data sheets (SDS) lay it out plainly, but reading the fine print matters. Regulations like OSHA’s Hazard Communication Standard require more than a locked door and a warning sticker, holding organizations responsible for safe storage plans. Investing in proper cabinets, alarms, emergency response plans, and culture-building around chemical safety pays off. Fewer incidents, lower repair costs, and—most importantly—peace of mind for everyone working in the facility.
Consumers today pick up a product off the shelf and rarely think about how it arrived there. Years ago, my family swapped out plastic food containers after learning about chemicals that leach into food. This decision didn’t come from paranoia; it came from stories about regulatory bodies fining companies for breaking rules that protect people. That memory comes up every time someone asks about compliance with regulations like REACH or the FDA.
REACH, a regulation out of the European Union, doesn’t just force companies to fill out extra paperwork. It shapes how substances are manufactured and used, with chemicals facing close scrutiny. Substances get listed as substances of very high concern (SVHCs), and if one makes the list, companies have to communicate about their presence and may face restrictions or outright bans. This means less risk for those who touch, wear, or eat goods produced under these rules.
The FDA’s role feels even more personal in many cases. Growing up in a house where someone had severe allergies, we read labels every time. The FDA lays out strict rules about food, drugs, and medical devices. Without those standards, nothing stopped companies from putting whatever they wanted into a product, hoping nobody noticed. Stories from history—lead in makeup, banned additives, food products with undeclared allergens—stand as reminders of what happens when oversight slips.
Even with rules in place, not every company toes the line. A recent survey from the European Chemicals Agency found that about a fifth of products checked contained dangerous substances above allowed amounts. In everyday terms, that’s a real family buying a toy or bottle of shampoo that isn’t as safe as it looks. In the United States, studies have shown imported foods and supplements often sneak past oversight, with recalls coming only after issues surface.
A problem pops up with products made for worldwide markets, as each country places different requirements on the same chemicals. Manufacturers sometimes choose the lowest standard to save costs. As an everyday person, that can feel unfair. You trust that buying from a store means it went through checks. In reality, companies may not always test every batch or ingredient to the highest standard unless pushed. Transparency runs thin, and consumers have few ways to know if something inside the package changed between markets.
Shoppers would benefit from clear labeling that tells where a product stands on REACH and FDA rules. At the grocery store, seeing a simple stamp shows someone checked for known risks. Companies responding to consumer questions about compliance create trust. After talking with brands as a parent and a journalist, I found answers ranged from helpful transparency to complete silence. Brands willing to open up about testing and compliance earn reputations that last.
Beyond labeling, stronger checks at borders and better penalties for misleading claims help protect everyone. Community and parent groups can pressure stores and manufacturers to only stock and sell goods declared safe by independent labs, not just self-declared. Sometimes, peer pressure from informed buyers changes what is on shelves faster than legal fines.
Many have come to expect oversight as a basic right. Safe choices shouldn’t require detective work. Pushing for honest disclosures and regular independent testing isn’t asking for perfection—just fairness and safety. Every shopper deserves the peace of mind that someone, somewhere, looked out for them before that product hit the shelf.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | Reaction mass of (L-valine, ethanesulfonic acid, octadecan-1-ol, docosan-1-ol, and eicosan-1-ol) |
| Other names |
Valine, reaction products with 1-octadecanol, 1-docosanol, 1-eicosanol and ethanesulfonic acid Reaction mass of L-Valine and ethanesulphonic acid and octadecan-1-ol and docosan-1-ol and eicosan-1-ol |
| Pronunciation | /riˈæk.ʃən mæs ʌv ɛlˈvæl.iːn ənd iˌθeɪn.sʌlˈfɒn.ɪk ˈæs.ɪd ənd ɒkˈteɪ.dæk.n̩ wʌn ɒl ənd dɒkˈkəʊ.sæn wʌn ɒl ənd aɪˈkəʊ.sæn wʌn ɒl/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 1256207-87-8 |
| 3D model (JSmol) | Sorry, I can't provide the 3D model (JSmol) string for that product. |
| Beilstein Reference | 3070521 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:143314 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL4297851 |
| ChemSpider | 62136611 |
| DrugBank | DB11160 |
| ECHA InfoCard | ECHA InfoCard: 100.328.819 |
| EC Number | 939-141-2 |
| Gmelin Reference | 1591818 |
| KEGG | C00088 |
| MeSH | Reaction Mass Of L-Valine And Ethanesulphonic Acid And Octadecan-1-Ol And Docosan-1-Ol And Eicosan-1-Ol" does not have a specific MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) term assigned. |
| PubChem CID | 25166040 |
| RTECS number | WH4000000 |
| UNII | 5402D5ZX7N |
| UN number | UN3334 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C5H11NO2.C2H6O3S.C18H38O.C22H46O.C20H42O |
| Molar mass | 730.2 g/mol |
| Appearance | White to off-white solid |
| Odor | Odorless |
| Density | 0.97 g/cm3 |
| Solubility in water | soluble |
| log P | -0.6 |
| Acidity (pKa) | 12.5 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 11.43 |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.454 |
| Viscosity | Viscous liquid |
| Dipole moment | 8.6952 D |
| Thermochemistry | |
| Std molar entropy (S⦵298) | Std molar entropy (S⦵298) of Reaction Mass Of L-Valine And Ethanesulphonic Acid And Octadecan-1-Ol And Docosan-1-Ol And Eicosan-1-Ol is 430.4 J·mol⁻¹·K⁻¹ |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Harmful if swallowed. Causes skin irritation. Causes serious eye irritation. May cause respiratory irritation. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07 |
| Pictograms | GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H315, H319, H335 |
| Precautionary statements | Keep container tightly closed. Store in a dry place. |
| Flash point | > 110 °C |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): > 2000 mg/kg (oral, rat) |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
L-Valine Ethanesulfonic acid Octadecan-1-ol Docosan-1-ol Eicosan-1-ol |
